← All worksThe insilico hand / Development study

Make dexterity
repairable.

Human form. Accessible mechanics. A hand that can return to the task after its wearing parts have been replaced.

Current checkpoint
One passive index finger
HAND-S0001 / mechanics-03Interactive 3D / The index-finger checkpoint
A browser representation of the current dimensioned index-finger CAD assembly. Retained joints, finite stops, separate pads, replaceable liners and guide components can be inspected assembled or exploded.

The index-finger checkpoint · Three-dimensional study

Drag to orbit · Shift + drag to pan · + / − zoom

The architecture, made inspectable.

These are the placed parts of the current CAD specimen. Rotate, pan and separate the assembly to inspect its construction. This checkpoint establishes passive geometry before adding the drives and feedback that would make it a working finger.

Source-bound CAD visualization. No actuators, working sensors or continuous tendon path are present. Exploded offsets aid inspection; they are not an assembly sequence. The specimen is not manufacturing released.

Inside The index-finger checkpoint
Joint structure
Four passive geometric axes, including separate splay and flexion pivots at the finger base.
Retained pivots
Metal sleeve and fastener envelopes define the nominal assembly around each joint.
Finite stops
Curved slots and stop pins provide explicit geometric travel limits.
Replaceable guides
Separate guide and liner components keep wear interfaces accessible.
Contact pad
A removable pad sits over an empty carrier reserved for future sensing.
Bench interface
The current base supports a finger experiment. A final hand-to-arm interface is future work.
insilico / inspectionThe index-finger checkpoint
What the digital checkpoint establishes

Geometry before
performance.

We checked the parts as an assembly and sampled their passive movement. These are digital geometry results; physical fit, strength and service life still require hardware.

22
Distinct part definitions
91
Placed part instances
4
Passive geometric axes
105
Sampled poses clear of interference

Checkpoint mechanics-03 · Nominal CAD clearances · Sampled poses do not prove collision-free continuous motion.

The architecture we are pursuing

Borrow the anatomy.
Rethink the service.

A human hand places complexity across bones, tendons, muscles and skin. We are pursuing a modular electric-tendon architecture with a human-shaped envelope, accessible drives and replaceable contact surfaces.

The first drives belong on a bench, where tendon travel, tension, friction and heat can be measured. Compact forearm packaging comes after those demands are understood.

The useful innovation would be dexterity that survives a repair: replace a worn component, recover the calibration and return to the same task. That is a proposition we intend to test.

Proposed motion architecture

The wrist turns the hand.
Tendons move the fingers.

In the proposed architecture, forearm motors turn small drums. Guided tendons carry their pull across the wrist to the finger joints. Separate wrist drives orient the hand. Tendons pull; an opposing tendon or return mechanism must reopen the joints and keep the transmission tensioned.

Arm
Positions the hand in space.
Wrist
Orients the palm toward the task.
Tendons
Transmit force to articulate the fingers.
Feedback
Measures joint state and tension so the control can correct its motion.

The wrist actuator bank on the homepage sketches the proposed packaging. Its drive count, routing and compensation remain to be designed: turning the wrist must not unintentionally pull the fingers closed.

The next experiment

One finger.
A measured loop.

Turn the passive specimen into an instrumented comparison before scaling it into a complete hand.

  1. Drive

    Route the force.

    Add a continuous tendon path, a serviceable drive and an explicit return or preload mechanism. Measure friction and available travel.

  2. Observe

    Close the loop.

    Measure joint angles and tendon tension. Compare independently controlled and coupled distal motion on the same task.

  3. Recover

    Repeat after replacement.

    Replace a wear component, recalibrate and repeat the test. Record the time, error and any loss of capability.

A physical problem worth solving.

What should a robot
be able to do?